LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for KIDS_COUNSEL-L Archives


KIDS_COUNSEL-L Archives

KIDS_COUNSEL-L Archives


KIDS_COUNSEL-L@LISTSERV.UCONN.EDU


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

KIDS_COUNSEL-L Home

KIDS_COUNSEL-L Home

KIDS_COUNSEL-L  June 2014

KIDS_COUNSEL-L June 2014

Subject:

res judicata or does the appeal process ever end for DCF??

From:

"Jennifer M. Celentano" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

KidsCounsel ListServ <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:53:03 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (19 lines)

Hello all,
I have a juvenile case where I tried the consolidated Order of Temporary Custody and Neglect petition on May 23rd.  The judge ruled from the bench and vacated the OTC and dismissed the neglect petition, however, my clients agreed to a stay of the vacating of the OTC and dismissal of the neglect petition until May 28th (in order for DCF to put the services back in the house).

Thereafter, DCF filed a Motion on May 27th to extend the stay while they filed an appeal. The trial judge denied it, and the next day, DCF filed a Motion with the Appellate Court for a review of the denial of the Stay.  That action essentially continued the stay that should have been vacated on May 28th.  The parties filed briefs on DCF's motion for review of the stay and today the Appellate Court issued an order for the trial court to stay the order dismissing the neglect petition but to vacate the Order of Temporary Custody.

The child should have been returned to the Respondent parents,however, DCF took a 96 hour hold on the baby even though the child has been in their custody and the appellate court denied their request to extend the OTC.  Has anyone ever dealt with this type of situation?  It is our position that DCF had a chance to present its claims as to imminent physical harm at the trial level and they lost, and then also presented their argument as to the appellate court staying the order and they lost again.  My client should not have to go through another trial on the same facts and issues.  Any advice is appreciated.  Thank  you.
Jennifer

Jennifer M. Celentano, Esq. 
Law Offices of Jennifer M. Celentano, LLC 
P.O. Box 512
North Haven, CT 06473
Tel: (203) 605-1111 
Fax:(203) 907-1367
Email: [log in to unmask]
www.celentanolaw.com
 

The information in this e-mail transmission is ATTORNEY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. The information is intended only for the use of the Person named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us by telephone immediately. Thank you.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

June 2020
April 2019
February 2019
November 2018
October 2018
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.UCONN.EDU

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager