 |
 |
LIKE!!!!!!! NICE JOB Gives me some hope Trudy Condio Attorney Trudy Condio P.O. Box 175 Manchester, CT 06045 860-646-1502 860-432-3713 Fax Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID The contents of this message, together with any attachments, are intended only for the use of the person(s) to which they are addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Further, any medical information herein is confidential and protected by law. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to use, review, copy, disclose or disseminate confidential medical information. If you are not the intended recipient, immediately advise the sender and delete this message and any attachments. Any distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment is prohibited. Jennifer Celentano <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >Thanks! > >Sent from my iPhone > > >On Jun 13, 2014, at 8:15 PM, Atty EFJ <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >Where's the LIKE button when you need it??? > >Sent from my "smart" phone > > >On Jun 13, 2014, at 4:45 PM, Jennifer Celentano <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >Thank you for all the responses over the past couple of days. I filed 2 additional motions last night, a motion for contempt and motion for order requesting that the court restrain DCF from invoking any further 96 hour holds. We appeared at 3:00 pm today at court and DCF advised the court that it allowed the 96 hour hold to expire today at noon. The child is now returned to the care and custody of the parents!! My motions for contempt became moot after the 96 hour hold was rescinded. Thanks again for all of the advice and suggestions. > >Jennifer > > >Sent from my iPhone > > >On Jun 12, 2014, at 9:33 AM, Lisa Vincent <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >I would start with contempt and res judicata. If they proceed, I would hold them to evidence that developed between the trial court ruling and the new hold. Please let us know what happens. > > >Lisa > > >Lisa M. Vincent > >The Law Office of Lisa M. Vincent > >379 Prospect Street > >Torrington, CT 06790 > >(860)626-8986 > > > >On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Scott Moulton <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >Wouldn't a Writ of Mandamus be an appropriate response to something like this? > > > >On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Trudy Condio <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >Is there no end to how low they will stoop? > > >Trudy Condio > > >Attorney Trudy Condio > >P.O. Box 175 > >Manchester, CT 06045 > >860-646-1502 > >860-432-3713 Fax > >Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID > > >The contents of this message, together with any attachments, are intended only for the use of the person(s) to which they are addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Further, any medical information herein is confidential and protected by law. It is unlawful for unauthorized persons to use, review, copy, disclose or disseminate confidential medical information. If you are not the intended recipient, immediately advise the sender and delete this message and any attachments. Any distribution, or copying of this message, or any attachment is prohibited. > > > >Christina Ghio <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >How about a motion for emergency relief under 34a-23 and/or a motion for contempt? > >Christina D. Ghio, Esq. >The Law Office of Christina D. Ghio, LLC >P.O. Box 186 >Cheshire, CT 06410 >ph.203-439-0656 >ph. 860-580-9443 >fax 860-516-1550 >[log in to unmask] >www.ctchildlaw.com > > >-----Original Message----- >From: KidsCounsel ListServ [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jennifer M. Celentano >Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 4:53 PM >To: [log in to unmask] >Subject: [KIDSCOUNSEL-L] res judicata or does the appeal process ever end for DCF?? > >Hello all, >I have a juvenile case where I tried the consolidated Order of Temporary Custody and Neglect petition on May 23rd. The judge ruled from the bench and vacated the OTC and dismissed the neglect petition, however, my clients agreed to a stay of the vacating of the OTC and dismissal of the neglect petition until May 28th (in order for DCF to put the services back in the house). > >Thereafter, DCF filed a Motion on May 27th to extend the stay while they filed an appeal. The trial judge denied it, and the next day, DCF filed a Motion with the Appellate Court for a review of the denial of the Stay. That action essentially continued the stay that should have been vacated on May 28th. The parties filed briefs on DCF's motion for review of the stay and today the Appellate Court issued an order for the trial court to stay the order dismissing the neglect petition but to vacate the Order of Temporary Custody. > >The child should have been returned to the Respondent parents,however, DCF took a 96 hour hold on the baby even though the child has been in their custody and the appellate court denied their request to extend the OTC. Has anyone ever dealt with this type of situation? It is our position that DCF had a chance to present its claims as to imminent physical harm at the trial level and they lost, and then also presented their argument as to the appellate court staying the order and they lost again. My client should not have to go through another trial on the same facts and issues. Any advice is appreciated. Thank you. >Jennifer > >Jennifer M. Celentano, Esq. >Law Offices of Jennifer M. Celentano, LLC P.O. Box 512 North Haven, CT 06473 >Tel: (203) 605-1111 >Fax:(203) 907-1367 >Email: [log in to unmask] >www.celentanolaw.com > > >The information in this e-mail transmission is ATTORNEY PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. The information is intended only for the use of the Person named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us by telephone immediately. Thank you. > > >