Print

Print


What if you put the data you want the folks to edit in a database that is not within the ArcGIS umbrella?  Keep the “shape” away from the “data” and join it back later.

 

Scott Sharlow

Information Systems Director

Town of Bloomfield, CT

800 Bloomfield Avenue

Bloomfield, CT  06002

860-769-3539

 

From: Unmoderated discussion list for Connecticut GIS Users [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nicholas McNamara
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 12:37 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CTGIS-L] Collector Offline Users

 

Yes as far as the background maps go, but there are assets that are there for reference that need to be able to be queried, but not edited. For example, we may want them to do hydrant inspection, but not edit the hydrant information itself, or the mains that they are connected to.

 

Nick

 

From: Meghan McGaffin [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 12:35 PM
To: Nicholas McNamara; [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: Collector Offline Users

 

Can you use one of the pre-canned background maps so you don’t have editable layers other than what they’re collecting?  If you submit your basemap data to the Community Basemaps program you would have a background map that you trust.

 

Meg McGaffin

GIS Analyst

City of Milford CT

70 West River St

Milford, CT 06460

[log in to unmask]

203-783-3393

 

 

 

 

 

From: Unmoderated discussion list for Connecticut GIS Users [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nicholas McNamara
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 4:39 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [CTGIS-L] Collector Offline Users

 

I wonder if anyone who knows about collector knows of a workaround for this.

Right now, if you want to use Collector in an offline mode, Esri told me you have to allow all layers to be editable. The way it is, your field crews can accidentally (or intentionally) destroy data and bypass the normal QA/QC process and GIS editors. There needs to be the ability to only allow layers to be edited that we want to be edited, while leaving other layers for query purposes only.

This really seems like a reckless implementation to me… it short-circuts the GIS editor and leaves the data that we try so hard to get right open to get messed up.  Why would they do such a thing?

I added an entry to ArcGIS Ideas to add this feature. If you agree, would you please promote it? (just log in and hit the thumbs up). I’m not sure how to link to it, but it is called “Collector Offline - Control Editing by Layer.”

Is it possible to block editing on some layers when the user tries to sync edits back up to the server, while allowing edits in the Collector app just to satisfy it? I just want to have one layer for redlining, where the user will make notes and they can be synced back up with the server. Maybe something we can do on the SQL side of things or in ArcGIS Server or something? I’m open to any workaround, otherwise it looks like the app is a dealbreaker for us using mobile, because there really are no other good disconnected options.

 

Nicholas A. McNamara, GISP

GIS Coordinator

South Norwalk Electric and Water

Phone: (203) 866-4446 ext. 2035

Fax:       (203) 854-0609

 

 

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list (CTGIS-L) is an unmoderated discussion list for all CT GIS Users.

If you no longer wish to receive e-mail from this list, you can remove yourself by going to http://listserv.uconn.edu/ctgis-l.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list (CTGIS-L) is an unmoderated discussion list for all CT GIS Users.

If you no longer wish to receive e-mail from this list, you can remove yourself by going to http://listserv.uconn.edu/ctgis-l.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list (CTGIS-L) is an unmoderated discussion list for all CT GIS Users.

If you no longer wish to receive e-mail from this list, you can remove yourself by going to http://listserv.uconn.edu/ctgis-l.html