 |
 |
Hey Andy, we use an R10 and an S6 and typically do an integrated survey, which allows you to get the cm accuracy when the GPS satellite signal is no good, it will automatically switch between the total station and the RTK GPS depending on what signal is better. It's a great setup because you use the RTK GPS to get control for the robotic total station and can be run by one person. We have mapped all of our campus infrastructure in this manner. Samuel Lingeman '00, GISP CAD/DMS/GIS Administrator Campus Dig Safe Coordinator [logo] Facilities-Campus Planning 22 Colovos Rd Durham, NH 03824 603-862-4218<tel:603-862-4218> Facilities Website<http://www.unh.edu/facilities/> 43° 8'10.65"N 70°56'20.23"W From: Northeast Arc Users Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Andy Smith-Petersen Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:31 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: GPS Strategy for Difficult Environments Friends, We have a goal of shooting 50,000+ services and countless other bits of infrastructure with cm-level accuracy. Our Trimble R8 units normally work well for this task if satellite visibility is good. But in tree cover and urban canyons, or on difficult-to-occupy targets, fixes are difficult and even the estimates of error can be off. What GPS technology or strategy/ies should we be looking at as part of our work process to achieve this goal? What's worked for you (or tried and failed)? Especially interested in hearing from other utilities on this topic. Thanks, Andy Andy Smith-Petersen Business System Analyst - GIS Portland Water District Phone: 207-523-5417 E-mail: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> http://www.pwd.org Portland Water District NOTICE & DISCLAIMER Confidentiality Notice: THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL. Please notify the sender if you have received this message in error. Recipients should be aware that replies to this message may not be considered confidential under the Maine Freedom of Access law, 1 M.R.S.A. §402, and may therefore be subject to public disclosure upon request. [cid:[log in to unmask]] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list (NEARC-L) is an unmoderated discussion list for all NEARC Users. If you no longer wish to receive e-mail from this list, you can remove yourself by going to http://s.uconn.edu/nearcsubscribe. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list (NEARC-L) is an unmoderated discussion list for all NEARC Users. If you no longer wish to receive e-mail from this list, you can remove yourself by going to http://s.uconn.edu/nearcsubscribe.