 |
 |
New question but same topic –
I am curious if anyone directly edits the default version of the SDE data – is this a bad idea? I believe this is the case but I would like to hear what others have to say.
I have discovered much of our SDE data is “registered as versioned” but the one other version that exists - is from 2014. It has
not been edited since that time. The way it is set up now, all edits are made directly to the default version. I would be interested in hearing if anyone just edits the default and does not bother to have other versions.
It seems to me it would be better to register the data as
non-versioned and edit non-versioned data. Or, set up versioning properly, post edits to the default from an edit-version and keep up with doing a compress on a regular basis.
I have gotten a lot of great advice from ESRI Tech Support – they recommend setting up versioning correctly. I am really new to being in a partial data administration role (last week) and any advice from seasoned SDE experts would be
helpful. I need real-world experiences to back up my argument.
Caroline
From: Northeast Arc Users Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Peter Lemack
Sent: Monday, October 9, 2017 12:52 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: SDE geodatabase versions
You can do all manual post and reconciling in either catalog or desktop.
Post, reconcile, delete, compress, create new versions.
Peter
On Oct 9, 2017 12:47 PM, "Peter Lemack" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: